2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Based Human Reliability Analysis Onboard Ships

Abstract: Human performance monitoring has become a core matter of maritime industry since crew error ratios cannot be reduced to the desired level. This study develops an approach to conduct human reliability analysis (HRA) via knowledge-based system in order to minimize the operational problems that may arise from human errors on-board ships. The model base of the system takes the advantage of human error assessment and reduction technique (HEART) which is robust tool in reliability assessment. The main role of progra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be in a safe side, it must be ensured that the reliability of the system on the ship is 100% [72,73]. On the contrary, it is better to have system on land with reliability of 100%, but not compulsory as the system on ship [74,75]. Other difference is the penetration of the PV system on a ship is limited by the allowable area on that ship.…”
Section: What Is the Difference Between The Hres On Land And On Ship?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be in a safe side, it must be ensured that the reliability of the system on the ship is 100% [72,73]. On the contrary, it is better to have system on land with reliability of 100%, but not compulsory as the system on ship [74,75]. Other difference is the penetration of the PV system on a ship is limited by the allowable area on that ship.…”
Section: What Is the Difference Between The Hres On Land And On Ship?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park (1987), Bell and Holroyd (2009), Akyuz and Celik (2015), Noroozi et al (2013), De Felice et al (2012, Zio et al (2009), Konstandinidou et al (2006), Bertolini (2007), and Deacon et al (2013). In general, HRA involves the use of qualitative and quantitative methods to assess and quantify the human contribution to the risk profile (Bell and Holroyd, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, Bell and Holroyd (2009) carried out a literature review and, a total of 72 potential human reliability related tools are identified. Akyuz and Celik (2015) developed an approach to estimate HRA via knowledge-based system, to minimize the operational problems that may arise from human errors on-board ships. Noroozi et al (2013) proposed a risk-based methodology for pre-and post-maintenance of a pump based on Human Error Assessment Reduction Technique (HEART).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the literature is poor for proposing practicable, easy-implementation, digitalized and remotely controllable application tools for HEART-based studies. In the literature, Akyuz and Celik [ 1 ] have identified a software-based tool for easier process of HEART. This tool allows to calculate all processes via computer in a user-friendly way, however, there is no significant effect on other features such as reducing time consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%