2008
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-3005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Based Documentation: Effects on Parent-Provider Communication During Pediatric Health Maintenance Encounters

Abstract: The introduction of ClicTate into the health maintenance encounter positively affected several aspects of parent-clinician communication in a pediatric clinic setting. These results support the integration of computer-based documentation into primary care pediatric visits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies noted that EMR use appeared to facilitate clarification, questions and discussion, as well as more open-ended questions and partnership strategies. 32,34,35,40 Specific behaviors that seemed to facilitate a more patient-centered interaction included actively inviting patients to look at the screen and using it as an educational tool (i.e., showing test results), signposting computer use, maintaining eye contact, cessation of computer use when patients spoke about sensitive or important topics, continued verbal and nonverbal cues of listening, and reading aloud while typing. 30,34,38,42,54 Additionally, being able to make computer use less obvious (i.e., typing softly, continuing to speak while typing) resulted in fewer patient speech pattern modifications.…”
Section: Characterizing Emr Communication Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four studies noted that EMR use appeared to facilitate clarification, questions and discussion, as well as more open-ended questions and partnership strategies. 32,34,35,40 Specific behaviors that seemed to facilitate a more patient-centered interaction included actively inviting patients to look at the screen and using it as an educational tool (i.e., showing test results), signposting computer use, maintaining eye contact, cessation of computer use when patients spoke about sensitive or important topics, continued verbal and nonverbal cues of listening, and reading aloud while typing. 30,34,38,42,54 Additionally, being able to make computer use less obvious (i.e., typing softly, continuing to speak while typing) resulted in fewer patient speech pattern modifications.…”
Section: Characterizing Emr Communication Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,34,38,42,54 Additionally, being able to make computer use less obvious (i.e., typing softly, continuing to speak while typing) resulted in fewer patient speech pattern modifications. 29 Five studies 29,32,36,40,49 included both a pre-and a post-EMR implementation observation group; however, only two paired findings were to the same physician at both points. 29,36 Paired observations showed greater doctor preoccupation with computer use and alterations in doctor and patient speech patterns, such as delaying speech until finished with the computer.…”
Section: Characterizing Emr Communication Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 3 articles (Garrison et al, 30 Hsu et al, 2 and Johnson et al 31 ) give patient satisfaction results in percentage format; that is, what percent rated their overall care as either "excellent" or "very good." Even if all 5 papers reported their results using similar statistics (such as all Likert scores), we still think that, because 2 articles sampled physicians and 3 sampled patients, the individuals cited in these articles are too different; therefore, pooling the responses from these articles would not be appropriate.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Poolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the 4 studies that evaluated patient satisfaction before and after EHR implementation found no effect on patient satisfaction (ie, neutral results by Johnson et al 31 and Garrison et al 30 ), whereas one found a positive result (Hsu et al 2 ) and another found a negative effect (Gadd and Penrod 29 ) (Table 3). Hsu et al 2 showed positive findings when assessing patient satisfaction 2 months before and at 1 and 7 months after EHR implementation.…”
Section: Pre/post Studies' Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 We conducted a systematic literature review on the effect of the EMR on the patient-physician relationship and communication. 7 While observational studies identified behaviors that researchers believe promoted communication (i.e., clarification of information, facilitation of discussion), [8][9][10][11] potentially negative behaviors (i.e., increased speech interruption and unsuccessful physician multitasking) [12][13][14][15][16] have been noted as well. 7 A limitation of most of these studies however is their lack of correlation between researcher-observed behaviors and the patient's own experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%