2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3614-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Computer-based Cobb angle measurement using deflection points in adolescence idiopathic scoliosis from radiographic images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on radiography) of a three-dimensional deformity of the spine. In order to be able to measure the Cobb angle, the bony curved edges of the cover and base plates of the two mostly tilted vertebral bodies around the apex, must be clearly visible in the X-ray image [22]. Therefore, even if it were possible to measure the marginal angle between the two endplates of the vertebral bodies in our 3D model that can not be exactly the same (or comparable) with the Cobb angle measured on the 2D X-ray image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on radiography) of a three-dimensional deformity of the spine. In order to be able to measure the Cobb angle, the bony curved edges of the cover and base plates of the two mostly tilted vertebral bodies around the apex, must be clearly visible in the X-ray image [22]. Therefore, even if it were possible to measure the marginal angle between the two endplates of the vertebral bodies in our 3D model that can not be exactly the same (or comparable) with the Cobb angle measured on the 2D X-ray image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The picture archiving and communications system (PACS) has a built-in feature that allows users to digitally draw the required vertebral line, and the system automatically measures the CA. This method is more reliable and less variable than manual measurement on printed X-ray images using a protractor 12 , 13 , and the measurement accuracy has improved to within ± 3.3° of the true value 14 – 21 . However, PACS requires manual selection of the appropriate end vertebrae by surgeons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The picture archiving and communications system (PACS) has a built-in feature that allows users to digitally draw the required vertebral line, and the system automatically measures the CA. This method is more reliable and less variable than manual measurement on printed X-ray images using a protractor [12,13], and the measurement accuracy has improved to within ± 3.3° of the true value [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, PACS requires manual selection of the appropriate end vertebrae by surgeons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%