PsycTESTS Dataset 1986
DOI: 10.1037/t13500-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Attitude Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, discrepancies exist in the literature about such basic issues as the relationship between computer aversion and variables such as age, gender, cognitive abilities, and computer experience. For example, some studies have indicated that younger persons report less computer aversion (e.g., Nickell & Pinto, 1986;Rosen et al, 1987), but in other studies (e.g., Ansley & Erber, 1988;Honeyman & White, 1987) no such relationship has been found. Conflicting findings may partly be the result of the wide range of sample sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, discrepancies exist in the literature about such basic issues as the relationship between computer aversion and variables such as age, gender, cognitive abilities, and computer experience. For example, some studies have indicated that younger persons report less computer aversion (e.g., Nickell & Pinto, 1986;Rosen et al, 1987), but in other studies (e.g., Ansley & Erber, 1988;Honeyman & White, 1987) no such relationship has been found. Conflicting findings may partly be the result of the wide range of sample sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The scale used for Internet attitude was a modified version of Sam et al (2005) who originally adapted the Computer Attitude Scale that has 20-item, developed and validated by Nickell and Pinto (1986). The internet attitude scale in the current study has only 10 items (see Appendix 1).…”
Section: Questionnaire Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu ölçeğin Türkçe uyarlaması Berberoğlu ve Çalıkoğlu (1991) tarafından yapılmış ancak Türkiye'nin sosyo-kültürel yapısında bu tutum ölçeğinin tek boyutlu bir yapıyı ölçtüğünü görülmüştür. Nickell ve Pinto (1986) ölçeğe bilgisayarın yararı isimli bir boyut daha ekleyerek bilgisayara yönelik tutumu dört boyutlu bir yapı olarak ele almıştır. Ancak gelişen teknoloji ve değişen kültür nedeniyle zamanla ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik özellikleri kaybolmaya başlamıştır (LaLomia ve Sidowski, 1990;Rainer ve Miller, 1996).…”
Section: öğRencilerin Bilgisayara Yönelik Tutumları Ve Tutum öLçekleriunclassified