2011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008489.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-assisted versus oral-and-written family history taking for identifying people with elevated risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A purposeful sample of articles was included based on relevance to build the Results and Discussion section. Robust evidence regarding CAHT and DMIA systems and their impact on the medical consultation was limited, as most studies evaluating these systems focused on other aspects, such as acquiring dietary or family history to estimate risk for diabetes, studies evaluating computer-assisted data collection for specific populations or related to screening, studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of computer-based medical histories, or efforts to generally computerize medicine, just to give some examples [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A purposeful sample of articles was included based on relevance to build the Results and Discussion section. Robust evidence regarding CAHT and DMIA systems and their impact on the medical consultation was limited, as most studies evaluating these systems focused on other aspects, such as acquiring dietary or family history to estimate risk for diabetes, studies evaluating computer-assisted data collection for specific populations or related to screening, studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of computer-based medical histories, or efforts to generally computerize medicine, just to give some examples [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Observational data also show that empathic communication can modify more objective clinical outcomes such as HBA1c. 14,15 Studies also show that enhanced empathy makes a positive difference in both deprived and affluent populations. 16 This is important in the context of the inverse care law.…”
Section: Does Empathy Make a Difference?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, for example, computer-aided history-taking, long available, is underused. 14 The spread of alternatives to faceto-face consultations is still in its infancy, as is our understanding of when a machine will do and when a person-to-person relationship is needed evolves.…”
Section: Supporting Empathic Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most strategies are targeting health education, mainly to raise the awareness for early HIV testing. Health education, especially the top-down perspective, has been criticized for its preaching style and lack of target population insight [ 33 , 34 ]. Other strategies like HIV self-testing decrease the barriers to HIV testing uptake but are not able to motivate those who think it is unnecessary to have HIV testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%