2003
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b3.14212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: Do We Need Caos?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of these problems, the application of CAS navigation technology in RHA appears reasonable. Computer navigation improves implant positioning and may prolong survivorship in total hip and knee replacement arthroplasty [3,15]. However, there is a paucity of experimental and clinical data relative to CAS applications in RHA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of these problems, the application of CAS navigation technology in RHA appears reasonable. Computer navigation improves implant positioning and may prolong survivorship in total hip and knee replacement arthroplasty [3,15]. However, there is a paucity of experimental and clinical data relative to CAS applications in RHA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in computer-assisted navigation technology (CAS) address the several fundamental limitations inherent in conventional alignment and implant positioning tools for total hip and knee arthroplasty [4,6,11,13,15,16]. More recently, CAS tools have been used in clinical settings for RHA navigation; however, clinical experience and radiological outcomes of CAS applications in RHA are still limited [1,7], and little is known about their accuracy [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of cadaver and clinical studies have validated the precision of these systems in specimens or patients with normal or near normal preoperative lower limb mechanical alignment, in terms of postoperative component alignment [6,16]. This reduction in risk for component mal-alignment is well demonstrated by a recent meta-analysis of the published literature in navigated TKA, demonstrating a normal or Gaussian distribution to the summated results with reduced standard deviation from the mean when postoperative alignment is measured [15,17]. Whilst this demonstrates the high degree of precision achievable with navigation systems, it does not identify the factor responsible for outlying results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are now numerous published precision studies in the literature which report on the clinical outcomes of procedures performed using a navigation system [2,15,18,20], including a recent study evaluating initial experience with EM technology [1]. The majority of cadaver and clinical studies have validated the precision of these systems in specimens or patients with normal or near normal preoperative lower limb mechanical alignment, in terms of postoperative component alignment [6,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an anatomical registration process has been completed the positioning and angles of the bone cuts can be controlled and monitored. 3 The system has been validated in cadavers and in clinical use 4,5 and the author has experience of its use in over 150 TKRs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%