1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0270-3092(82)80006-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-assisted handwriting instruction and visual/kinaesthetic feedback processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, improvement in performance in a writing task requires a systematic training process and can not be evoked by general Visual-motor training, which combines systematic motor exercise along with observation of letter model with motion, was expected to boost the transfer of information gained visually into motor knowledge. The efficacy of visual and kinaesthetic feedback on handwriting was indeed found in mentally disabled children (Lally, 1982). It should, therefore, be the most conducive to improvement of performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, improvement in performance in a writing task requires a systematic training process and can not be evoked by general Visual-motor training, which combines systematic motor exercise along with observation of letter model with motion, was expected to boost the transfer of information gained visually into motor knowledge. The efficacy of visual and kinaesthetic feedback on handwriting was indeed found in mentally disabled children (Lally, 1982). It should, therefore, be the most conducive to improvement of performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In a study by Macleod and Lally (1981) with 18 mildly handicapped students with handwriting difficulties, the computer-based system resulted in greater improvement in manuscript handwriting than traditional handwriting instruction. In a second study with nine boys in a special school, Lally (1982) found that the greatest improvement in manuscript writing was made when the degree of variation allowed in tracking a letter was systematically reduced as students reached an asymptote in speed and accuracy of tracking.…”
Section: Computer-assisted Handwriting Instructionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, field tests of computerized handwriting programs have been positive. The computer has been used as a guide to improve the letter formation of students with and without mental retardation (Brewer et al, 1989(Brewer et al, -1990Lally, 1982;White, Cunningham, & Brewer, 1989). Until computers and other technological advances become more common in children's homes and the classroom, though, computerized instruction will not play a significant role in handwriting development.…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%