2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-assisted cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: What is the active ingredient?

Abstract: An emerging body of research has shown that computer-assisted cognitive remediation, consisting of training in attention, memory, language and/or problem-solving, produces improvement in neurocognitive function that generalizes to untrained neurocognitive tests and may also impact symptoms and work functioning in patients with schizophrenia. The active ingredient of these interventions, however, remains unknown as control groups in these studies have typically included few, if any, of the elements of these com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
127
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
127
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients who agreed to take part in the study gave written, informed consent at the time of their entry to outpatient rehabilitation and were randomly assigned to one of two computerized cognitive rehabilitation groups (cognitive remediation or computer-skills training). The results comparing the relative effects of these interventions on neuropsychological test performance in a subset of the patients described in this paper were previously reported (Kurtz et al, 2007). In the present paper we describe results collapsed across computer interventions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Patients who agreed to take part in the study gave written, informed consent at the time of their entry to outpatient rehabilitation and were randomly assigned to one of two computerized cognitive rehabilitation groups (cognitive remediation or computer-skills training). The results comparing the relative effects of these interventions on neuropsychological test performance in a subset of the patients described in this paper were previously reported (Kurtz et al, 2007). In the present paper we describe results collapsed across computer interventions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…We cannot determine the relative contribution of each of these activities to observed benefits, and they may work synergistically. However, a recent study, using some of the same computer exercises employed in this study, also found that the patients receiving the exercises showed greater improvement on Digit Span than did a comparison group (Kurtz et al, 2007). Since that study did not include additional groups or employment in the intervention, it suggests that the most important factor in the present results may be the computerized cognitive remediation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…(Twamley, Jeste, Bellack, 2003;Kurtz et al, 2001). Cognitive training has been shown to improve sustained attention and language processing (Wexler et al, 1997), executive function (Bell et al, 2001, Wykes et al, 1999, affect recognition (Bell et al, 2001), verbal memory (Hogarty et al, 2004;McGurk & Mueser, 2004), working memory (Bell et al, 2001;Kurtz et al, 2007), processing speed (Hogarty et al, 2004) and social problem solving (Kern et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two theoretical arguments support this view. Firstly, literature states that computer exercises hold opportunities for learning novel strategies that enable bypassing impaired abilities (Kurtz et al, 2007). Secondly, repeated practice in a multimedia environment is believed to hasten cortical reorganization (Butti et al, 1998).…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the studies presented here have been selected on the basis that they employ assessment tasks that are different from tasks used during training. Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of CACR in schizophrenia (Bell et al, 2001;Bellucci et al, 2002;Burda et al, 1994;Field et al, 1997;Greig et al, 2007;Hogarty et al, 2004;Kurtz et al, 2007;Medalia et al, 2000;Medalia et al, 2001;Sartory et al, 2005;Vauth et al, 2005). Most have reported improvements of cognitive performances, with some exceptions as for example Field and colleagues (1997) and Medalia and colleagues (2000).…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%