2021
DOI: 10.1044/2020_persp-20-00191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Assisted Challenge Point Intervention for Residual Speech Errors

Abstract: Purpose This preliminary case series investigated the effects of biofeedback intervention for residual rhotic errors delivered within a modified challenge point framework. In the challenge point framework, practice difficulty is adaptively adjusted with the goal of enhancing generalization learning. This study more specifically evaluated the feasibility of a computer-mediated implementation of challenge point treatment for rhotic errors using a custom open-source software, the Challenge Point Progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Segment boundaries and orthographic labels were annotated using Praat TextGrids. In the case of more recent studies these segmentation labels were placed automatically using intensity detection or by our treatment software, CPP [18], in which case the automatically generated segmentations and transcripts were manually verified by trained research assistants. The utterances were extracted using Praat [19] or the Parselmouth API [20] for Praat, depending on the originating study.…”
Section: Audio Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segment boundaries and orthographic labels were annotated using Praat TextGrids. In the case of more recent studies these segmentation labels were placed automatically using intensity detection or by our treatment software, CPP [18], in which case the automatically generated segmentations and transcripts were manually verified by trained research assistants. The utterances were extracted using Praat [19] or the Parselmouth API [20] for Praat, depending on the originating study.…”
Section: Audio Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%