The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-assisted anatomically placed double-bundle ACL reconstruction: An in vitro experiment with different tension angles for the AM and the PL graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,57,58 Modifications of surgical techniques including doublebundle reconstruction 62 and anatomic single-bundle reconstruction 7,42 have been proposed in an attempt to address the problem of persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity. Although a number of biomechanical studies have shown improvements in rotatory control with these techniques, 28,30,60 no clinical study has resulted in superior patient-reported outcomes over conventional techniques. 35,53 Additionally, higher failure rates have been reported in a number of studies in which an anatomic surgical technique was performed, suggesting that a more anatomic ACL graft placement may lead to greater forces being placed on the ACL graft, resulting in a subsequent increase in risk of graft rupture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,57,58 Modifications of surgical techniques including doublebundle reconstruction 62 and anatomic single-bundle reconstruction 7,42 have been proposed in an attempt to address the problem of persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity. Although a number of biomechanical studies have shown improvements in rotatory control with these techniques, 28,30,60 no clinical study has resulted in superior patient-reported outcomes over conventional techniques. 35,53 Additionally, higher failure rates have been reported in a number of studies in which an anatomic surgical technique was performed, suggesting that a more anatomic ACL graft placement may lead to greater forces being placed on the ACL graft, resulting in a subsequent increase in risk of graft rupture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,35 As a consequence, better clinical performance and a lower incidence of osteoarthritis (OA) should be observed in patients undergoing DB reconstruction. 10,16,18,37 In recent years, therefore, anatomic DB ACLR has gained popularity. The definition of anatomic ACLR is the functional restoration of the ACL to its native dimension, collagen orientation, and insertion site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are many arguments for DB reconstruction based on kinematic, cadaveric, in vivo, and clinical outcome studies. 10,16,18,37 Graft options for ACLR include bone-patellar tendonbone (BPTB) autografts, hamstring tendon autografts, quadriceps autografts, and various allografts. 34 For many years, the BPTB autograft was regarded as the gold standard for ACLR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we focused on the computer assisted femoral ACL placement; in another study the effect of method application at knee laxity results was evaluated in an in vitro study . However, at this stage we do not know what the clinical implications are of the errors found in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%