2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-01727-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Architecture Performance Evaluation Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were heavily inspired by more recent work on performance modeling of both software [15,16,24,25,30,31,38,52,56,64,65] and hardware [9,10,19,20,27,28,37]. In particular, we borrowed the notion of performance interfaces as programs from PIX [30] and Freud [56], although both use such interfaces for software running on general-purpose hardware and neither can reason about throughput.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were heavily inspired by more recent work on performance modeling of both software [15,16,24,25,30,31,38,52,56,64,65] and hardware [9,10,19,20,27,28,37]. In particular, we borrowed the notion of performance interfaces as programs from PIX [30] and Freud [56], although both use such interfaces for software running on general-purpose hardware and neither can reason about throughput.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our initial experiences and discussions with accelerator builders give us three reasons to be optimistic. First, since accelerators are much simpler than today's general-purpose hardware, we can rely on high-fidelity models from the 80s and 90s (summarized in [19]). Second, since a performance interface only describes performance and not functionality [30], it can abstract away all implementation details that are only relevant to functionality, and it could be much simpler than the underlying implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%