1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(89)90118-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer analysis of spectra with strongly overlapping lines. Application to TRIPLE resonance spectra of the chlorophyll a cation radical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this technique can be also be used to assign lines in a spectrum to different species of RCs. For the evaluation of spectra with overlapping lines a spectral deconvolution program was employed (Trankle & Lendzian, 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this technique can be also be used to assign lines in a spectrum to different species of RCs. For the evaluation of spectra with overlapping lines a spectral deconvolution program was employed (Trankle & Lendzian, 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cation radical of the BChl dimer was generated in the cavity by continuous wave illumination with a tungsten halogen lamp (100 W, 700-950 nm using filters) (23). The hfcs were determined by fits of the spectra (25), and the spin density distribution was calculated from the ratios of the methyl hfcs assigned to each half of the dimer as described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deconvolution of the ENDOR spectra was achieved with the program Compass. 43 The A zz values are collected in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PTC as derived from the time-resolved ENDOR experiments shown in Fig.5. The magnitudes were determined by deconvolution of the ENDOR spectra by the program Compass,43 and the signs as set out in the text. The dipolar 'matrix' couplings are not A zz hyperfine coupling tensor components and so are given the label x in the table (experimental error ±0.1 MHz).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%