1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01537275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer analysis of orally propagated contractions in canine small intestine after Billroth-II gastrectomy

Abstract: The aims of the study were to characterize an unusual motor pattern with orally propagated intestinal contractions occurring after subtotal gastrectomy and to clarify if orally propagated contractions also occur during the normal fasted and fed motor pattern in intact dogs. Jejunal motility was recorded with multiple closely spaced extraluminal transducers. Contractile patterns were analyzed by a special computerized method. Following a Billroth-II gastrectomy without additional vagotomy, the migrating motor c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,19 The jejunal MMC periodicity was short in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who received total gastrectomy. 13 With hydrogen breath measurement used to represent small bowel motility, the phenomenon of hyperactive small bowel movement in patients after peptic ulcer surgery was confirmed by our study, as well as by Rieu et al 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,19 The jejunal MMC periodicity was short in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who received total gastrectomy. 13 With hydrogen breath measurement used to represent small bowel motility, the phenomenon of hyperactive small bowel movement in patients after peptic ulcer surgery was confirmed by our study, as well as by Rieu et al 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Some studies already indicate that peptic ulcer surgery leads to rapid small bowel transit and strong contractions. 5,[7][8][9] The proximal and distal portions of the stomach are fundamentally different in their motor functions dealing with gastric emptying. The proximal portion is usually responsible for the accommodation of the food, whereas the distal portion mainly grinds food.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%