1976
DOI: 10.1109/tphp.1976.1135151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Aided Thermal Anlaysis of a Hybrid Mutlistage Active Bandpass Filter/Amplifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balents et al [2] used the constant value of 45˚ as the heat spreading angle and conducted an approximate heat transfer analysis concerning a heat dissipating element mounted directly on a ceramic substrate which was bonded to a metal baseplate. After a while, the 45˚ heat spreading model of Balents et al was used by Cook et al [3] in 1976, and thereafter many attempts have been made to modify the value or extend the theory of the heat spreading angle. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned 45˚ heat spreading angle is still familiar among thermal designers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balents et al [2] used the constant value of 45˚ as the heat spreading angle and conducted an approximate heat transfer analysis concerning a heat dissipating element mounted directly on a ceramic substrate which was bonded to a metal baseplate. After a while, the 45˚ heat spreading model of Balents et al was used by Cook et al [3] in 1976, and thereafter many attempts have been made to modify the value or extend the theory of the heat spreading angle. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned 45˚ heat spreading angle is still familiar among thermal designers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another team developed a set of equations for heat transfer in integrated circuits [2]. Some have performed thermal modeling with the assumption that the spreading angle is 45 degrees [3]. Others have rejected the 45 degree spreading angle assumption all together [4] [5], and some have used other spreading angles of 32.5 degrees [6] or 26.6 degrees [7] claiming that they are a more accurate approximation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%