1991
DOI: 10.1080/00207549108948036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer aided robot selection: the ‘multiple attribute decision making’ approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These sub-criteria which support and influence the determinant level criteria, as identified by Aggarwal et al [13], are as follows: i. Configuration of robot; ii. Electrical controls; iii.…”
Section: Attributes Identification-cluster/norm Levelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These sub-criteria which support and influence the determinant level criteria, as identified by Aggarwal et al [13], are as follows: i. Configuration of robot; ii. Electrical controls; iii.…”
Section: Attributes Identification-cluster/norm Levelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…HTA analyses uses different methods, depending on the purpose of the assessment; some of them used economic approach: cost-analyses (Drummond et al, 1987), some a managerial approach SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analyses, logical framework (Armstrong, 1982;Kahveci et al, 2006) and some other a more pluralistic approach: Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) analyses, hierarchical clustering (Agrawal et al, 1991). Each of these methods have their own particular or partial judgment aspects.…”
Section: Origins Of Health Technology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grover, Khan (2004, 2006) applied it for TQM evaluation of an industry and to find the role of human factors in TQM. There are multiple other applications of GTA in many areas; some representative ones are: robot selection (Agrawal et al, 1991), failure cause analysis (Gandhi & Agrawal, 1996), development of maintainability index for mechanical systems (Wani & Gandhi , 1999), machinability evaluation of work materials (Rao & Gandhi, 2002), capability envelop of a machining process (Huang & Yip-Hoi, 2003), performance evaluation of TQM in Indian industries (Kulkarni, 2005), selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots (Rao & Padmanabhan, 2006), to optimize single-product flow-line configurations of RMS (Dou et al, 2009) and so on.…”
Section: Graph Theoretic and Matrix Approach (Gtma)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development and use of appropriate assessment approaches are crucial to ensuring that the analysis of each AMT project considers all benefits and costs (Small & Chen, Investment Justification of Advanced manufacturing Technology: An Empirical Analysis, 1995). The representing work of researchers in the field of AMS selection is as: Agrawal, et al, 1991;Bhangle, et al, 2004;Bozdag˘, et al, 2003;Braglia, et al, 2010;Chu, et al, 2003;Chuu, 2009;Karsak, et al, 2002;Kumar, et al, 2010;Luong, 1998;Rao, et al, 2006;Sambasivarao, et al, 1995;Sarkis, 1997;Yurdakul, 2004.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Amsmentioning
confidence: 99%