1993
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4485(93)90055-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided optimal design via modified adaptive random-search algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prayoonrat and Walton [4] proposed a practical approach to optimum gear train design using a direct search method while minimizing the distance between the two shafts. Zarefar and Muthukrishnan [5] used a random search method to solve the SRDP where the weight is minimized under various constraints. Li et al [6] optimized the design of involute profile helical gears by determining the adequate geometrical factors proposed by the American standard AGMA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prayoonrat and Walton [4] proposed a practical approach to optimum gear train design using a direct search method while minimizing the distance between the two shafts. Zarefar and Muthukrishnan [5] used a random search method to solve the SRDP where the weight is minimized under various constraints. Li et al [6] optimized the design of involute profile helical gears by determining the adequate geometrical factors proposed by the American standard AGMA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of references [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] highlights a common fact that the proposed design approaches employ exclusively one type of models, analytical or numerical (i.e. FEM) one, to evaluate the performances of any design candidate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enumeration technique is preferred to the random methods [12][13][14][15] and the advanced stochastic methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] because the number of the possible solutions to the 2DET could be well limited considering practical manufacturing requirements and a high-performance computer could scan and evaluate all the candidates efficiently. In addition, multiple criteria are simultaneously optimized for the 2DET using the MMPO to find global optima since the MMPO could well represent the real optimization purposes of designers in an intuitive, reasonable and comprehensive way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Design variables During the optimization process, the selections of design variables have crucial influences on the accuracy of the optimization results. Whether there are links among the design variables or not combined with the determination of objective function need to be considered as to the selections of the variables [10]. For example, in an optimal design which aims at the minimum volume, the facewidths of two stages should be regarded as two isolated optimization variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%