1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0094-114x(97)00101-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided manufacturing of spiral bevel and hypoid gears with minimum surface-deviation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is recognized to be the inexorable trend to apply the modern advanced manufacturing technologies on the innovation of manufacturing modes (Lin et al 1998). Liu et al (2000) suggested networked manufacturing, which is a manufacturing mode combined manufacturing technologies with network technologies, has become the important direction of development for manufacturing spiral bevel gears in 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recognized to be the inexorable trend to apply the modern advanced manufacturing technologies on the innovation of manufacturing modes (Lin et al 1998). Liu et al (2000) suggested networked manufacturing, which is a manufacturing mode combined manufacturing technologies with network technologies, has become the important direction of development for manufacturing spiral bevel gears in 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simon [17] proposed a method for determination of the optimal polynomial function for representation of machine tool setting variations for the pinion tooth finishing. Lin [18] applied some optimization techniques for minimization of surface deviations of the real cut pinion and gear tooth surfaces. Wang [19] proposed a novel face-hobbing method to generate spur gears with lengthwise crowning by two head cutters form an imaginary generating rack with cycloidal lengthwise tooth traces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method similar to the one in [2] was presented by Stadtfeld in [5, ch. 9], while an approach based on linear regression and similar to the one in [4] was presented by Lin et al in [6], together with a sensitivity analysis of tooth surface to machine-tool setting variations. Gosselin et al [7] defined five average surface errors and minimized them by eventually solving a nonlinear system of five equations in five unknown machine settings.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%