2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.10.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Aided Diagnostic System for Detection of Leukemia Using Microscopic Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, handsearching of relevant studies and the top Google Scholar results yielded 40 studies for full‐text review. After removing duplicates, twenty‐three (23) studies satisfied the inclusion criteria (see Figure ). The studies were classified according to the type of leukemia into: ALL (13), AML (8), CLL (3), and CML (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, handsearching of relevant studies and the top Google Scholar results yielded 40 studies for full‐text review. After removing duplicates, twenty‐three (23) studies satisfied the inclusion criteria (see Figure ). The studies were classified according to the type of leukemia into: ALL (13), AML (8), CLL (3), and CML (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other leukemia subsets, pathology diagnosis of ALL was the subset with the higher number of studies. Of the included studies, 13 studies investigated the role of ML tools in ALL diagnosis, with 12 studies applied ML tools on microscopic diagnosis and one study applied them on flow cytometric diagnosis . Seven of the included studies, applying ML on microscopic diagnosis, used only peripheral blood smears, with four studies using bone marrow slides along with blood smears.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the pixels were segmented through learning by training method, for the sake of ALL identification. Jyoti Rawat et al [5] reported a classification method using GLCM-texture features and shape features along with the SVM classifier, which shows better classification accuracy rate of 89.8% than was the one accomplished by applying them separately. Morteza Moradi Amin et al [6] examined k-means clustering in partitioning the pixels of blood cell images into four distinct clusters, using the H and S components of the HSV color space.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique the texture can be modelled as two dimensional gray level variations which can be modelled as two dimensional arrays. The frequency of different combinations of pixel values occur in an image can be tabulate as co-occurrence matrix [12].The GLCM texture features include energy, correlation, sum, contrast, variance, average, homogeneity (inverse difference moment),sum variance, difference variance, sum entropy, difference entropy ,entropy and information measures of correlation describes the texture of the image [2]. For leukocytes the texture features are basically tabulated separately for both nuclei and cytoplasm.…”
Section: Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix(glcm)mentioning
confidence: 99%