2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-009-0396-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided diagnosis of lumbar disc pathology from clinical lower spine MRI

Abstract: We achieve high accuracy for detection of abnormal discs using our proposed model that incorporates disc appearance, location, and context. We show the extendability of our proposed model to subsequent diagnosis tasks specific to each intervertebral disc abnormality such as desiccation and herniation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note the summation is over a very large set of possible assignments . We model it as a Gibbs distribution (4) (5) (6) where is a pixel on the lattice , is the intensity level of the pixel , , are tunable parameters, the notation denotes the set of neighboring elements on the disc chain. , , and are the partition functions that make the normalizing constant for the Gibbs distribution for each model, respectively.…”
Section: B Two-level Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note the summation is over a very large set of possible assignments . We model it as a Gibbs distribution (4) (5) (6) where is a pixel on the lattice , is the intensity level of the pixel , , are tunable parameters, the notation denotes the set of neighboring elements on the disc chain. , , and are the partition functions that make the normalizing constant for the Gibbs distribution for each model, respectively.…”
Section: B Two-level Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 The purpose of the segmentation is to provide robust and automated tools for further diagnosis tasks such as our previous work. [9][10][11] Probabilistic graphical models have been used for spine localization and labeling such as Schmidt et al 7 whose work focuses on the whole spine and Alomari et al 8 focusing only on lumbar area. Their models incorporated both appearance and space information of the discs to localize and label the discs from MRI.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC of 0.92 for combination marker for diagnosis was comparable with the accuracy of existing CAD systems. 17 Moreover, we used a large number of lumbar discs for validation. We plan to extend the diagnosis study on other spine regions in the future for wider area diagnosis and prognosis.…”
Section: New and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%