2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9672-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Hyperacute Stroke with Thrombolysis Decision Support Using a Contralateral Comparative Method of CT Image Analysis

Abstract: New and improved techniques have been continuously introduced into CT and MR imaging modalities for the diagnosis and therapy planning of acute stroke. Nevertheless, non-contrast CT (NCCT) is almost always used by every institution as the front line diagnostic imaging modality due to its high affordability and availability. Consequently, the potential reward of extracting as much clinical information as possible from NCCT images can be very great. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has become the g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the use of NCCT is intrinsically a quantitative and standardized process for infarct brain tissues. The previous literature suggested that since inherent anatomical structures in the human brain are symmetric, ischemic tissues can be highlighted by comparing the left and right sides of a brain [18,19].…”
Section: Asymmetric Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the use of NCCT is intrinsically a quantitative and standardized process for infarct brain tissues. The previous literature suggested that since inherent anatomical structures in the human brain are symmetric, ischemic tissues can be highlighted by comparing the left and right sides of a brain [18,19].…”
Section: Asymmetric Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Automated ASPECTS using machine learning has been developed to assist interpretation of NCCT scans. [7][8][9][10][11] Although prior validation studies of commercial computer systems for ASPECTS 7,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] in comparison to human experts exist, these automated methods have not been evaluated using large independent data cohorts that have a variety of image acquisition parameters and patient characteristics. Validation of automated ASPECTS on small data sets from a limited number of sites may result in biased estimations of accuracy in favor of the automated system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17] In recent years, evidence that automated ASPECTS scoring methods based on machine learning are comparable with expert reading of ASPECTS is accumulating. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In this study, we developed an automated ASPECTS scoring system based on machine learning and feature engineering and compared it with expert ASPECTS readings on acute DWI. We introduced multiple highorder computational textural features into our machine learning model and hypothesized that this automated method can determine ASPECTS scores accurately and reliably compared with expert ASPECTS readings on acute DWI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%