2013
DOI: 10.1186/1687-6180-2013-157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided diagnosis for diagnostically challenging breast lesions in DCE-MRI based on image registration and integration of morphologic and dynamic characteristics

Abstract: Diagnostically challenging lesions comprise both foci (small lesions) and non-mass-like enhancing lesions and pose a challenge to current computer-aided diagnosis systems. Motion-based artifacts lead in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance to diagnostic misinterpretation; therefore, motion compensation represents an important prerequisite to automatic lesion detection and diagnosis. In addition, the extraction of pertinent kinetic and morphologic features as lesion descriptors is an equally impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, for classification tasks, we observed the use of classifiers such as k-nearest neighbor (Filipczuk et al, 2013;Gedik and Atasoy, 2013;Gopinath and Shanthi, 2013;He et al, 2011;Muramatsu et al, 2013;Nava et al, 2014;Odeh et al, 2006;Osman et al, 2009;Raja et al, 2010;Verikas et al, 2006), artificial neural networks (Barhoumi et al, 2007;Geetha et al, 2008;Jasmine et al, 2009;López et al, 2008;Raja et al, 2007;Streba et al, 2012;Verma, 2009;Wu et al, 2006), Bayesian classifiers (Ampeliotis et al, 2007;Bhooshan et al, 2011;Garnavi et al, 2012;Gruszauskas et al, 2008Gruszauskas et al, , 2009Retter et al, 2013;Tolouee et al, 2011) techniques based on linear discriminant analysis (Lee et al, 2009;Muramatsu et al, 2013;Tanner et al, 2006) and logistic regression models (Shen et al, 2007;Tanner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Tasks For Computer-aided Diagnosis Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for classification tasks, we observed the use of classifiers such as k-nearest neighbor (Filipczuk et al, 2013;Gedik and Atasoy, 2013;Gopinath and Shanthi, 2013;He et al, 2011;Muramatsu et al, 2013;Nava et al, 2014;Odeh et al, 2006;Osman et al, 2009;Raja et al, 2010;Verikas et al, 2006), artificial neural networks (Barhoumi et al, 2007;Geetha et al, 2008;Jasmine et al, 2009;López et al, 2008;Raja et al, 2007;Streba et al, 2012;Verma, 2009;Wu et al, 2006), Bayesian classifiers (Ampeliotis et al, 2007;Bhooshan et al, 2011;Garnavi et al, 2012;Gruszauskas et al, 2008Gruszauskas et al, , 2009Retter et al, 2013;Tolouee et al, 2011) techniques based on linear discriminant analysis (Lee et al, 2009;Muramatsu et al, 2013;Tanner et al, 2006) and logistic regression models (Shen et al, 2007;Tanner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Tasks For Computer-aided Diagnosis Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%