2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00215-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various meta-analyses, that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CADe-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy (CC), have shown a significant increase in ADR in favor of CADe-assisted colonoscopy (33.7-36.6% versus 22.9-26.6%, respectively). Similarly, PDR also significantly increased in the CADe group compared to the CC group (45.6% versus 30.6%, respectively) [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Various meta-analyses, that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CADe-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy (CC), have shown a significant increase in ADR in favor of CADe-assisted colonoscopy (33.7-36.6% versus 22.9-26.6%, respectively). Similarly, PDR also significantly increased in the CADe group compared to the CC group (45.6% versus 30.6%, respectively) [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Artificial intelligence (AI), and particularly deep learning, is increasingly used for computer-aided detection (CAD) of (pre)malignancies in endoscopic images. Multiple studies have shown that AI algorithms developed for image analysis in colonoscopy can successfully recognize (pre) malignant colonic lesions, as well as grade the inflammation status in IBD patients [76][77][78][79][80][81]. These results have already been translated to the clinic with the launch of the first commercially available AI system for colonoscopy in 2019 (GI Genius, Medtronic).…”
Section: Translation From Clinical Evidence To Clinical Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent network meta-analysis of 50 RCTs comprising 34,445 participants compared CADe with high-definition white light endoscopy, IEE techniques, and techniques that increased mucosal visualisation such as distal attachments and FUSE. (89) CADe was ranked as the superior technique for adenoma detection. Crosscomparisons of CADe with other imaging techniques showed a significant increase in the ADR with CADe versus increased mucosal visualisation systems (OR 1.54 [95% CI 1.22-1.94]; low certainty of evidence) and with CADe versus chromoendoscopy (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.14-1.85]; moderate certainty of evidence).…”
Section: Integrating Ai-assisted Colonoscopy Into Current Clinical Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%