2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer aided detection of small acute intracranial hemorrhage on computer tomography of brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
60
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
60
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…11,[26][27][28] Nowinski and colleagues have compared agreement of different segmentation algorithms with respective manual segmentations. CCCs for algorithms based on clustering, graph theory, and modified thresholding were 0.87, 0.91, and 0.97, respectively, and they are comparable to the CCCs calculated for our segmentation algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[26][27][28] Nowinski and colleagues have compared agreement of different segmentation algorithms with respective manual segmentations. CCCs for algorithms based on clustering, graph theory, and modified thresholding were 0.87, 0.91, and 0.97, respectively, and they are comparable to the CCCs calculated for our segmentation algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other computer-aided detection methods have been proposed for intracranial hemorrhages; however, these are not suitable to automatically quantify SAH. For instance, the method of Chan 32 is based on the symmetry of the ventricles, which are segmented by thresholding only. Here, the assumption is made that no blood is present in the ventricles, which is often not the case in patients with SAH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some systems [6,7] claimed to be able to detect hemorrhage including SAH, they could detect only a small part of SAH with asymmetry and hyper-intensity. To be able to handle the exclusive features of SAH (partly hyperdense in SAS, and most with symmetry to the brain), we propose to detect the existence of SAH through two steps: approximation of the SAS via registration of an atlas with the patient data, and detecting abnormality in the approximated SAS through support vector machine (SVM) based pattern classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As shown in [5], misinterpretation of CT in patients with SAH is a common problem. Various hemorrhage detection systems have been reported [6][7][8][9][10], but none of them are suitable for the detection of SAH. These methods have two common assumptions: the hemorrhagic region in brain CT being hyperdense, and asymmetric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%