1973
DOI: 10.1093/bja/45.5.440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Trend Analysis in Automated Patient Monitoring Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A tracking vector comprising of the TTV values of individual features is generated 49 for 10 different changes in the physiological signal at different time-scales.…”
Section: Stress-trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tracking vector comprising of the TTV values of individual features is generated 49 for 10 different changes in the physiological signal at different time-scales.…”
Section: Stress-trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report on the development, implementation, and prelimina testing of a parallel version of the multi-state Kalman filtering algorithm (KFA) [4]; the KFA appears capable of accurately detecting and identifying ful physiologic trends and discarding certain unwanted physiologic artifcts from the patient record. [6], Patient Condition Factor [7], Exponentially mapped past variables [8], and a Monte Carlo technique [9]. Most of these methods were developed for highly speialized situations and lack general appLicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar in concept to Hope et al. 's patient condition factor [3] which discriminated between a beneficial change (towards the desired SAP) and an adverse change (away from the desired SAP). In a practical application the desired SAP could be stated at any time to reset the responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Hope et al. [3] modified this tracking signal as a result of observations made during measurements of physiological and pharmacological responses to produce a ‘Patient Condition Factor’. They defined upper and lower limits within which the signal should stay and the desired average value for the variable being measured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%