Objective
To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images with volume-rendered translucent display (VRTLD) series to plain radiographs for evaluating spinal surgical instrumentation following resection and reconstruction for spinal malignancies.
Methods
In 44 patients with tumor resection and spinal reconstruction, 17 with complications, three neuroradiologists evaluated plain radiographs, MDCT images alone, VRTLD images alone, and MDCT images with VRTLD images for identifying complications in three categories: subsidence/migration, construct fracture, and screw loosening. Each category was scored as 1 (complications), 2 (no complications), or 3 (not sure), and the minimum score was used for analyses. Clinical/surgical outcomes were the reference standard.
Results
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95% CI), respectively, were as follows: MDCT/VRTLD, 100%, 100%, 100% (91.96%-100.00%); MDCT alone, 88.24%, 100%, 95.45% (84.53%-99.44%); VRTLD alone, 82.35%, 96.3%, 90.91% (78.33%-97.47%); plain radiographs, 52.94%, 100%, 81.82% (67.29%-91.81%).
Conclusion
MDCT with VRTLD series seems best for evaluation of spinal instrumentation following tumor resection and reconstruction.