1977
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-197707000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomography of the Normal Pancreas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A partially good agreement could be found with the results published by Kreel [8], but only in the pancreas head region in the 6th and 7th decades. Because his patients were not divided into specific age groups, large differences may occur, in particular with the results from very young and very old patients.…”
Section: Pathoanatomical Observations and Their Comparison With Ct Fisupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A partially good agreement could be found with the results published by Kreel [8], but only in the pancreas head region in the 6th and 7th decades. Because his patients were not divided into specific age groups, large differences may occur, in particular with the results from very young and very old patients.…”
Section: Pathoanatomical Observations and Their Comparison With Ct Fisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The advent of computed tomography (CT) scanning has made direct visualization of the pancreas and other retroperitoneal structures possible [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Initial evaluations of normal pancreas using CT were done by Haaga [5][6][7], Sheedy [13,14], and Kreel [8]. These authors assessed diameters at right angles to the axis of the organ, without detailed correlation of the shape and structure of the pancreas itself or any reference to patient's age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are at best only a rough guide to pancreatic size, and it is important to correlate the full dimensions of the gland when evaluating the suspected pancreatic enlargement. [15] AP diameters of the pancreas in our series were different and not compatible with the values reported in the literature [16,17] as noticed in table (2) The data were expressed as Mean ± STDV, *Normal p-value is 0.05…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The use of the proposed formula, which includes commonly measured diameters of the pancreas by cross-sectional imaging, will provide fast calculation of the approximate pancreatic size in the regular clinical practice. One study had also reported that in adults beyond 60 years of age, both total and parenchymal pancreas measurements gradually decline and fat infiltration of the pancreas have been reported with aging in humans (16,17). Previous anatomical studies reported that pancreas measurements decreased after age 60 (18,19,20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the measurement we used the mean ventrodorsal diameter described by Kreel et al [6]: pancreatic body is 20_+ 2.5 ram. Atrophy is defined as less than 15 mm and enlargement is larger than 25 ram.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%