2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomography for characterization of fatigue performance of selective laser melted parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two aluminum alloys, AlSi10Mg and AlSi12, were investigated with platform heating as the main factor. The latter factor is identified in the previous literature as a control parameter to reduce remnant porosity and coarsen microstructure [10,11]. In this study, it was found consistent that platform heating improved ductility, but tensile strength was not reduced in AlSi10Mg alloy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two aluminum alloys, AlSi10Mg and AlSi12, were investigated with platform heating as the main factor. The latter factor is identified in the previous literature as a control parameter to reduce remnant porosity and coarsen microstructure [10,11]. In this study, it was found consistent that platform heating improved ductility, but tensile strength was not reduced in AlSi10Mg alloy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It is observable that batch A developed defects of bigger volume than batch B while in the latter the smaller diameter porosity (< 120 µm) was more. The relationship between stress developed by porosity and their size was described in detail in [10]. The latter identified pore diameter and location as the most influential factors.…”
Section: Experimental Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SCF increases for larger pores close to the groove tip, while it decreases if the pore diameter is reduced or the pore is moved further away from the groove tip. Siddique et al [11] expressed the SCF of a pore as a function of the pore diameter and distance from the surface (no surface roughness), with values for k t ranging from 1 to 1.178. When comparing the magnitude of the stress concentration from only surface defects (Eq.…”
Section: Figure 3 Optical Microscopy Image Of a Cross Section Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective SCF is then the SCF of the pore. Since the SCFs of pores are in the range of 1 to 1.178 [11], further crack propagation will be slowed down. Although sub-surface porosity might be present, it is unlikely it will be regularly distributed below the surface to blunt all cracks propagating.…”
Section: Figure 3 Optical Microscopy Image Of a Cross Section Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%