Computed tomography angiogram for left ventricular assist device thrombosis: When does it help?

Perri, Jennifer L.; Schroeder, Jamie; Fiedler, Amy G.

doi:10.1111/jocs.16902

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Not performing this critical diagnostic tool in ACS patients may mislead in treating ACS patients [33,34]. Angiograms not only assist clinicians in the decision-making related to the care of ACS patients but also help to predict the prognosis of the condition [35,36]. Some evidence shows that a timely angiogram helps reduce morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac conditions, as an angiogram defines a care pathway for patients presenting with cardiac conditions [37][38][39].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Clinical Trajectories and the Continuum of Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the United Kingdom: A Thorough Cross-Sectional Analysis

Zaki,

Bashir,

Mahdy

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The United Kingdom (UK) has a sustainable healthcare system. Nonetheless, the burden of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is still a significant challenge. A scarcity of literature primarily focuses on the continuum of care for ACS patients in the UK. Moreover, limited research studies highlight the clinical trajectories of ACS patients across the UK. Therefore, the current study was designed to explore clinical trajectories and the continuum of care for patients with ACS in the UK. Secondary data was obtained from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) database. The latest data available in the MINAP database was used. As our objective was to explore clinical trajectories and the continuum of care for patients, we retrieved data regarding the care received by ACS patients admitted to hospitals across the UK. The data of 85574 ACS patients was retrieved. A large number (n=47035) of patients were estimated to be eligible for the angiogram; however, an angiogram was performed for 87.15% (n=40995) of eligible patients. Angioplasty within 72 hours of admission was required for most (n=26313) ACS patients. Nonetheless, angioplasty within 72 hours of admission was performed for 59.7% (n=15703) of the eligible patients. There was a significant difference (P<0.05) between different regions of the UK and the percentage of patients for whom angioplasty was performed within 72 hours of admission. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed for 23923 ACS patients, of which the door-to-balloon interval for 17590 (73.5%) patients was ≤60 minutes while the door-to-balloon interval for 3086 (12.9%) patients was ≤90 minutes. Out of the total 85574 ACS patients, 65959 (77.08%) patients were discharged on appropriate medications, while 19615 (22.92%) were transferred to another hospital or died there. A total of 75361 were eligible to be referred to cardiac rehabilitation settings. Nonetheless, 64518 (85.61%) were referred to cardiac rehabilitation. About 85000 patients were reported in the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Wales). Optimal care was provided to most patients in the UK. However, some patients received sub-optimal care, highlighting the disparity in the healthcare system. There is a need to explore further the factors that might be responsible for the sub-optimal care to the patients.

show abstract