2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-012-0405-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal

Abstract: Radiation protection is a topic of great public concern and of many scientific investigations, because ionizing radiation is an established risk factor for leukaemia and many solid tumours. Exposure of the public to ionizing radiation includes exposure to background radiation, as well as medical and occupational exposures. A large fraction of the exposure from diagnostic procedures comes from medical imaging. Computed tomography (CT) is the major single contributor of diagnostic radiation exposure. An increase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
42
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8,30 Multiple authors have then extrapolated the expected risk of future cancer from CT scanning by equating the phantom model doses to the known risk reported in the BEIR VII report. 1,3,7,9,11,12,14,18,21,22,28,34 These models predict an alarming number of future cancers. Berrington de González et al predicted 29,000 future cancers and 14,500 future deaths in the US caused by 1 year of CT scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8,30 Multiple authors have then extrapolated the expected risk of future cancer from CT scanning by equating the phantom model doses to the known risk reported in the BEIR VII report. 1,3,7,9,11,12,14,18,21,22,28,34 These models predict an alarming number of future cancers. Berrington de González et al predicted 29,000 future cancers and 14,500 future deaths in the US caused by 1 year of CT scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.04 9 0.25 plus an additional 1 %). Due to the greater sensitivity of young subjects to radiation damage, the risk factor is 3-4 times more than in adults [27,28].…”
Section: Radiation Dose and Associated Cancer Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests frequently included radiographs and CT scans, both of which have been associated with an increased risk of cancer when administered during infancy. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Parents accessing the blog shared their concern about these diagnostic procedures. Because DSFC is a benign condition, observation is the best plan, and multiple diagnostic tests are unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%