1979
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-197910000-00043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomographic Scanning of the Thorax in the Staging of Bronchogenic Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study of 18 patients, CT was 67 percent accurate (6 percent false-positives, 28 percent false-negatives) in predicting middle mediastinal metastasis from lung cancer. 11 As above, the high false-negative rate was caused by cancerous deposits in lymph nodes that were not enlarged. Despite this deficiency, CT provided important additional information about the mediastinum in 17 percent of cases.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In another study of 18 patients, CT was 67 percent accurate (6 percent false-positives, 28 percent false-negatives) in predicting middle mediastinal metastasis from lung cancer. 11 As above, the high false-negative rate was caused by cancerous deposits in lymph nodes that were not enlarged. Despite this deficiency, CT provided important additional information about the mediastinum in 17 percent of cases.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In general, the results confirm a high degree of sensitivity in the detection of enlarged mediastinal nodes. In the small series by Underwood et al (1979), CT failed to detect abnormal nodes in five of nine patients Galen (1975). Galen (1975). shown to have malignant nodal involvement by mediastinoscopy; the authors attributed this low sensitivity (44%) to microscopic intranodal metastasis in the absence of marked lymph node distortion or enlargement.…”
Section: Conventional and Computed Mediastinal Tomographymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mintzer et a1.2' and Underwood et a1. 16 concluded that, although CT could predict mediastinal node involvement in a large fraction of cases, false-negatives ranged from 15% to 3696, with 2% false-positives. They also concluded that conventional tomograms were more sensitive for determining mediastinal involvement.…”
Section: Fig 5 False-negative Mediastinal Diagnosis (Reader Error)mentioning
confidence: 99%