1979
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.133.6.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomographic mammography (CTM)

Abstract: Breasts of 724 patients were studied by physical examinatIon, mammography, and computed tomographic mammography (CTM) using a scanner designed for evaluation of the breast. Among cases in which CTM was not accompanied by use of contrast material, there were 60 malignant lesions, of which 10% were missed by mammography, 32% by CTM, and 8% by both. Among cases where CTM was supplemented by a 50 ml injection of 75% contrast material, there were 63 malignant lesions, of which 14% were missed by mammography, I 6% b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 However, little progress was made due to the limitation of image quality and the exposure of the x-ray radiation dose. Although computed tomographic mam-mography ͑CTM͒ was studied in the late 1970s, [8][9][10] this modality was has been largely dismissed due to concerns about radiation dose and cost effectiveness. We and other investigators have been studying the feasibility of using a pendant geometry cone beam CT ͑CBCT͒ scanner for breast cancer imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 However, little progress was made due to the limitation of image quality and the exposure of the x-ray radiation dose. Although computed tomographic mam-mography ͑CTM͒ was studied in the late 1970s, [8][9][10] this modality was has been largely dismissed due to concerns about radiation dose and cost effectiveness. We and other investigators have been studying the feasibility of using a pendant geometry cone beam CT ͑CBCT͒ scanner for breast cancer imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cone-beam CT, on the other hand, can provide true 3D breast images with isotropic resolution (145 μm or smaller) and radiation dose comparable to two-view mammography [2]. Conventional fan-beam CT applied to breast cancer imaging in the 1970s suffered from limitations including high patient dose, low spatial resolution, long scanning time, large slice thickness, and cardiac and respiratory motion [3,4]. The advantages of cone-beam CT include a flatpanel digital detector, true 3D images with isotropic resolution, reduced motion artifacts, breast-only exposure to radiation, greater efficiency in use of the X-ray beam, no overlapping structures in the breast, and high contrast resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dedicated fan beam CT mammography imaging scanner for research was previously constructed by GE (GE Medical System, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) in the 1970s and clinical trials on the system were performed [8][9]. Due to then-immature CT technology, long scanning time, relatively low spatial resolution, suboptimal detector and x-ray technique used, it was not conclusive from the results of those studies if fan beam CT mammography of that time was superior to the then-conventional mammography of that time [8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to then-immature CT technology, long scanning time, relatively low spatial resolution, suboptimal detector and x-ray technique used, it was not conclusive from the results of those studies if fan beam CT mammography of that time was superior to the then-conventional mammography of that time [8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%