2017
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.21145-17.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomographic localization of the central sulcus: a morphometric study in adult patients

Abstract: The central sulcus was located accurately, on average 47.8 mm behind the bregma, which should be used instead of nasion in order to avoid gender discrepancy. The data obtained provide useful and reliable information to guide neurosurgical procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an easier skin landmark might be useful for identification of this major sulci of the brain. In this study, the mean distance between nasion and OSP of the SRoP was 190.7 ± 4.5 mm which is consistent with world literature [15]. Rhoton described an angle of 70° between midline and mean orientation of the central sulcus, which is comparable but higher than our results (56.79° ± 8°) [17].…”
Section: Central Sulcussupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, an easier skin landmark might be useful for identification of this major sulci of the brain. In this study, the mean distance between nasion and OSP of the SRoP was 190.7 ± 4.5 mm which is consistent with world literature [15]. Rhoton described an angle of 70° between midline and mean orientation of the central sulcus, which is comparable but higher than our results (56.79° ± 8°) [17].…”
Section: Central Sulcussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Rhoton described an angle of 70° between midline and mean orientation of the central sulcus, which is comparable but higher than our results (56.79° ± 8°) [17]. To the best of our knowledge, SPCP has never been precisely named in any anatomical study, but its localization is consistent with previous studies describing de pre-central sulcus [15].…”
Section: Central Sulcussupporting
confidence: 88%