2007
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181568cab
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomographic Angiography for the Diagnosis of Blunt Carotid/Vertebral Artery Injury

Abstract: Current CTA technology cannot reliably diagnose or exclude BCVI. Twenty percent of CTAs are either nonevaluable or suboptimal. Until more data are available and the technique is standardized, the current trend towards using CTA to screen for and/or diagnose these rare but potentially devastating injuries is dangerous.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
146
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant CTA learning curve has been described in which the diagnostic accuracy of CTA improved with time, with the specificity and negative predictive value climbing to 100% in the latter half of the study. 29 There is great heterogeneity in the reported diagnostic performance of CTA and lack of uniform, unbiased comparison with DSA. Paulus et al 11 reported an improved sensitivity of 64-detector row CTA and 32-detector row CTA, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 92% in 594 patients who met the screening criteria for BCVI and underwent both CTA and DSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant CTA learning curve has been described in which the diagnostic accuracy of CTA improved with time, with the specificity and negative predictive value climbing to 100% in the latter half of the study. 29 There is great heterogeneity in the reported diagnostic performance of CTA and lack of uniform, unbiased comparison with DSA. Paulus et al 11 reported an improved sensitivity of 64-detector row CTA and 32-detector row CTA, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 92% in 594 patients who met the screening criteria for BCVI and underwent both CTA and DSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,27,28 However DSA, the reference standard for BCVI detection, continues to be recommended despite being invasive, laborintensive, and available only in specialized centers. 3,4,9,25,[29][30][31] Most injuries missed on CTA are grade I injuries with luminal irregularity, but these have been shown to carry a significant risk of stroke. 3 In a meta-analysis comparing the accuracy of CTA against DSA for BCVI, Roberts et al 10 reported a pooled sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 97% for The incremental effectiveness in all iterations was negative (selective DSA has worse outcomes), and the incremental costs were positive (selective DSA is more expensive), suggesting that selective DSA is less cost-effective than selective CTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their comparative study of DSA and CTA, Malhotra et al found a specificity of 84% when using CTA to diagnose BCVI (35). The authors alluded to a high false negative rate in the first half of the study which they attributed to the learning curve of reporting radiologists.…”
Section: Computed Tomography Angiography (Cta)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies assessing the accuracy of 16-section multidetector CTA compared with DSA in trauma patients at risk for TCVI found sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values of 74%-97.7%, 84%-100%, 63%-100%, and 90%-99.3%, respectively. 8,17 The sensitivity of CTA is increased with greater severity of TCVI. 4 The diagnostic accuracy of CTA, specifically for traumatic aneurysms, particularly small ones, is limited.…”
Section: Value Of Cta For the Diagnosis And Surveillance Imaging Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%