2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computations of shear driven vortex flow in a cylindrical cavity using a modified k-ε turbulence model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational model predicted the vortex action resulting from the shear driven flow, however with slight over predictions of velocity in the near wall regions due to the use of the logarithmic law of the wall. The results of the validation case agree well with previous published simulations of turbulent shear driven cavity flows using the R ε /k-ε model for a wide range of Reynolds number [16]. Figure 6 shows the profiles of normalized U x and U y velocity components as plotted on line (a-a) for square cavity with different opening ratios as given in tab.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The computational model predicted the vortex action resulting from the shear driven flow, however with slight over predictions of velocity in the near wall regions due to the use of the logarithmic law of the wall. The results of the validation case agree well with previous published simulations of turbulent shear driven cavity flows using the R ε /k-ε model for a wide range of Reynolds number [16]. Figure 6 shows the profiles of normalized U x and U y velocity components as plotted on line (a-a) for square cavity with different opening ratios as given in tab.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It represents shear driven flow inside a partially open cylindrical cavity, fixed on the trailing edge of a flat plate. A complete computational analysis of such case has been previously reported by Saqr et al [16]. Figure 5 shows a comparison between numerical results and LDV measurements.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, although the isotropy assumption might lead to an intuition that turbulence viscosity predictions should not be accurate, extensive numerical investigations utilizing these models have yielded successful predictions of complex flows. Examples on the success of eddy viscosity models in predicting different types of vorticity-dominated flow and flow with streamline curvature can be found in [179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190]. LES [191] provides an alternative approach in which the large eddies are computed in a time-dependent simulation that uses a set of filtered equations.…”
Section: Turbulent Viscosity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signifi cant difference in results of numerical modeling of circulating fl ow in the circular cavity on the wall of a rotating channel [1] from the corresponding data obtained with the Doppler laser velocimeter on the experimental setup in Southampton [2] increasingly draws attention to the idea of correction of semiempirical turbulence models used to close Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations [3] with account of the infl uence of the streamline curvature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%