2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2011.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computations of self-propulsion free to sink and trim and of motions in head waves of the KRISO Container Ship (KCS) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case 6, according to the work by Carrica et al (2011), exhibits a very linear behaviour since the wavelength is very large. It can hence be regarded as the most linear condition amongst all of the cases.…”
Section: Ship Geometry and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Case 6, according to the work by Carrica et al (2011), exhibits a very linear behaviour since the wavelength is very large. It can hence be regarded as the most linear condition amongst all of the cases.…”
Section: Ship Geometry and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, during this literature review, it was seen that when using the KCS model, although resistance predictions have been conducted for a range of Froude numbers (for example Banks et al, 2010 andEnger et al, 2010), seakeeping analyses have only been performed at forward speeds corresponding to a Froude number of 0.26 or higher (for example Simonsen et al, 2013 andCarrica et al, 2011). This study therefore may be useful to understand the seakeeping behaviour and performance of the KCS model at a slow steaming speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of predicting ship wave loads with interface-capturing methods, several previous studies have contributed to this task, e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Even if such studies already exist, it is difficult to reach general conclusions on the validity of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mismatching hub can decrease the propulsive efficiency and cavitation performance significantly. In recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques have been employed more and more extensively for analyzing the performance of hydrodynamic systems (Carlton, Radosavljevic, & Whitworth, 2009;Carrica, Fu, & Stern, 2011;Dubbioso, Muscari, & Mascio, 2014;Lam, Hamill, & Robinson, 2013;Lam, Robinson, Hamill, & Johnston, 2012;Shamsi, Ghassemi, Molyneux, & Liu, 2014), designing propeller ESDs (Çelik, 2007;Lee, Bae, Kim, & Hoshino, 2014;Park, Jung, & Kim, 2005) and simulating the cavitation (Rafael et al, 2015;Singhal, Athavale, Li, & Jiang, 2002;Watanabe, Kawamura, Yoshihisa, Maeda, & Rhee, 2003;Zhu & Fang, 2012). The International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) discussed applications of the CFD method to calculating the hydrodynamic performance of propellers and believed that it could be used to obtain the open-water performance and pressure distribution of a propeller accurately (Salvatore, Streckwal, & Terwisga, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%