2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11045-013-0267-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally efficient 2-D DOA estimation for uniform rectangular arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the 2D DOA estimation with uniform rectangular arrays (URAs) has attracted widespread concern [2,3,4,5]. Various algorithms have been developed for improving the estimation performance, such as the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [6], estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) [7] and the matrix pencil (MP) method [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, the 2D DOA estimation with uniform rectangular arrays (URAs) has attracted widespread concern [2,3,4,5]. Various algorithms have been developed for improving the estimation performance, such as the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [6], estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) [7] and the matrix pencil (MP) method [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the proposed method can be given as follows: The methods in [3,4,15,16,17,21] involve the 2D EVD or 2D peak search, while the proposed method can estimate the parameters with 1D subspace-based estimation techniques.The method in [22] can only use the auto-correlations of different subarrays, while the proposed method can use more information including auto-correlations and cross-correlations.The spatial differencing techniques in [18,19] perform a difference operation on the whole subarrays, while the proposed method is only for the auto-correlations and the cross-correlations are kept completely. Thus, the SDMS method has little data loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1,2,3,4,5], which is an important research branch in array signal processing. Many 2D-DOA estimation algorithms have sprung up in recent years in order to improve the performance of angle estimation, which include the two dimensional multiple signal classification(2D MUSIC) algorithm [6], the 2D Unitary estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) algorithm [7], the modified 2D-ESPRIT algorithm [8], the matrix pencil method [9], the maximum likelihood method [10,11], the parallel factor (PARAFAC) algorithm [12], and so on [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. However, those 2D-DOA estimation algorithms are confronted with the problem of the high computational complexity generally and they are very difficult to apply in engineering practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while the subspace-based algorithm in [10] requires neither constructing the correlation matrix of the received data nor performing singular value decomposition (SVD) of the correlation matrix and utilizes the conjugate symmetry property to enlarge the effective array aperture. Another computationally efficient algorithm for URA was proposed in [11], where the complex-valued covariance matrix and the complex-valued search vector are transformed into real-valued ones, and the 2-D problem is decoupled into two 1-D problems with real-valued computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%