2018
DOI: 10.1002/adts.201800085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Understanding of the Growth of 2D Materials

Abstract: Over the last two decades, remarkable progress has been made in use of computational methods for understanding 2D materials growth. The aim of this Review is to provide an overview of several state-of-the-art computational methods for the modelling and simulation of 2D materials growth. First, the current status of 2D materials, and their major growth methods are addressed. Next, the applications of the ab initio method in 2D materials growth is discussed, focusing on reaction of precursors, diffusion of adato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 249 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Arrhenius plot shown in Figure d, we obtained E a of ≈2.4 eV, which is lower than the reported E a values for graphene growth on Cu in the range of 2.7–5.5 eV . The smaller activation energy for graphene grown on Cu/Ni (111) surface might be due to either lower dehydrogenation energy of carbon precursor, lower diffusion energy of carbon species on the substrate surface, or lower energy barrier for attaching a carbon cluster to the as‐formed graphene edge . In order to evaluate their quality, graphene samples were transferred onto silicon substrates with 300 nm SiO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…From the Arrhenius plot shown in Figure d, we obtained E a of ≈2.4 eV, which is lower than the reported E a values for graphene growth on Cu in the range of 2.7–5.5 eV . The smaller activation energy for graphene grown on Cu/Ni (111) surface might be due to either lower dehydrogenation energy of carbon precursor, lower diffusion energy of carbon species on the substrate surface, or lower energy barrier for attaching a carbon cluster to the as‐formed graphene edge . In order to evaluate their quality, graphene samples were transferred onto silicon substrates with 300 nm SiO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Sb and Bi preferred to form surface alloys with both Ag and Cu at low coverage . Therefore, besides the lattice mismatch, the interaction strength with substrates and the potential formation of surface alloys should also be considered when selecting appropriate substrates 4c,22. On weakly interacting surfaces such as graphene and passivated germanium, in situ low‐energy electron microscopy has been effective in elucidating the growth mechanisms of epitaxy antimonene which allows the control of adsorption, diffusion and aggregation via tuning the growth parameters 15c,h,23.…”
Section: Group Va Elements On Noble Metal Surfaces Buckled Phosphorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials have attracted much interest in recent years. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] A variety of layered materials are exfoliated into nanosheets, such as monolayer and few-layer nanosheets. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Anisotropic nanostructures exhibit characteristic properties different from those of bulk materials and isotropic morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%