2018
DOI: 10.1002/mma.5315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational uncertainty quantification for random time‐discrete epidemiological models using adaptive gPC

Abstract: Population dynamics models consisting of nonlinear difference equations allow us to get a better understanding of the processes involved in epidemiology. Usually, these mathematical models are studied under a deterministic approach.However, in order to take into account the uncertainties associated with the measurements of the model input parameters, a more realistic approach would be to consider these inputs as random variables. In this paper, we study the random time-discrete epidemiological models SIS, SIR,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variation of gPC expansions for continuous stochastic systems with dependent and jointly absolutely continuous random inputs, which is a method described in the work of Cortés et al and applied in the work of Calatayud et al We consider the canonical bases alignleftalign-1C1malign-2={1,A,A2,,Am},align-1C2malign-2=1,Y0,Y02,,Y0m,align-1C3malign-2=1,Y1,Y12,,Y1m, and the vector of random input coefficients, ζ =( A , Y 0 , Y 1 ). We consider a simple tensor product to construct a basis of monomials of degree less than or equal to m Ξp={ϕ0(ζ),ϕ1(ζ),,ϕp(ζ)}, where ϕ0=1,p=0m+33,ϕi(ζ)=Ai1Y0i2Y1i3, where i 1 + i 2 + i 3 ≤ m and i ↔( i 1 , i 2 , i 3 ) in a bijective manner.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variation of gPC expansions for continuous stochastic systems with dependent and jointly absolutely continuous random inputs, which is a method described in the work of Cortés et al and applied in the work of Calatayud et al We consider the canonical bases alignleftalign-1C1malign-2={1,A,A2,,Am},align-1C2malign-2=1,Y0,Y02,,Y0m,align-1C3malign-2=1,Y1,Y12,,Y1m, and the vector of random input coefficients, ζ =( A , Y 0 , Y 1 ). We consider a simple tensor product to construct a basis of monomials of degree less than or equal to m Ξp={ϕ0(ζ),ϕ1(ζ),,ϕp(ζ)}, where ϕ0=1,p=0m+33,ϕi(ζ)=Ai1Y0i2Y1i3, where i 1 + i 2 + i 3 ≤ m and i ↔( i 1 , i 2 , i 3 ) in a bijective manner.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo simulations require many realizations or simulations of X(t) to get accurately its statistics (the error convergence rate is inversely proportional to the square root of the number m of realizations); therefore, the computational cost of Monte Carlo simulations is higher than our method based on random series. • A variation of gPC expansions for continuous stochastic systems with dependent and jointly absolutely continuous random inputs, which is a method described in the work of Cortés et al 19 and applied in the work of Calatayud et al 20 We consider the canonical bases…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic Galerkin projection technique and gPC expansions have been profusely used in the literature for uncertainty quantification, see for example [24,35,90,117,126,138,144].…”
Section: Gpc Expansionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we will introduce a small perturbation into one of the parameters (with mean value being the deterministic estimate calculated) and we will apply the methodology previously exposed. Introducing only a small amount of randomness into the model from deterministic estimates allows a more faithful representation of the time evolution of the population, see for example [33,Example 5], [13,24,117,126,127]. In this article, as we are interested in testing our methodology on approximating the density function of the model output, but not in estimating probability distributions for the input parameters, we do not deal with inverse parameter estimation, see, for example, references [143] (pp.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation