2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Tools for Handling Molecular Clusters: Configurational Sampling, Storage, Analysis, and Machine Learning

Jakub Kubečka,
Vitus Besel,
Ivo Neefjes
et al.

Abstract: Computational modeling of atmospheric molecular clusters requires a comprehensive understanding of their complex configurational spaces, interaction patterns, stabilities against fragmentation, and even dynamic behaviors. To address these needs, we introduce the Jammy Key framework, a collection of automated scripts that facilitate and streamline molecular cluster modeling workflows. Jammy Key handles file manipulations between varieties of integrated third-party programs. The framework is divided into three m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-point energies, gradients, and geometries for the reparameterization, configurational sampling, and comparisons were calculated using the xtb 6.4.0 program using the GFN1-xTB 33 and AMC-xTB parameterizations. A modified version of ArbAlign 45 available in the JKCS program 46 was used to calculate the root-mean-square differences (RMSD) between molecular structures. Gaussian 16, version B.01 47 was used for the DFT calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-point energies, gradients, and geometries for the reparameterization, configurational sampling, and comparisons were calculated using the xtb 6.4.0 program using the GFN1-xTB 33 and AMC-xTB parameterizations. A modified version of ArbAlign 45 available in the JKCS program 46 was used to calculate the root-mean-square differences (RMSD) between molecular structures. Gaussian 16, version B.01 47 was used for the DFT calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-point energies, gradients, and geometries for the reparameterization, configurational sampling, and comparisons were calculated using the xtb 6.4.0 program using the GFN1-xTB 27 and AMC-xTB parameterizations. A modified version of ArbAlign 39 available in the JKCS program 40 was used to calculate the root-mean-square differences (RMSD) between molecular structures. Gaussian 16, version B.01 41 was used for the DFT calculations.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%