1997
DOI: 10.1039/a701789h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of zeolitic-proton[ndash ]palladium chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a decrease in electron deficiency of Pd and Pt on the less acidic supports, which agrees well with literature. 43,44 These findings support the results from XRD analysis, specifically the bimetallic/PdO ratio listed in…”
Section: Xpssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This indicates a decrease in electron deficiency of Pd and Pt on the less acidic supports, which agrees well with literature. 43,44 These findings support the results from XRD analysis, specifically the bimetallic/PdO ratio listed in…”
Section: Xpssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is seen that the Pd atom interacts with the acidic hydrogen atom and one of the zeolite framework oxygen atoms (O N ) bound to Al. This is in agreement with the study of Harmsen et al [24]. Recently, a similar structure in singlet state has also been reported to be more stable than the corresponding triplet and quintet states [19].…”
Section: Adsorption Of Pd In H-zsm-5supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Harmsen et al [24] reported a model description of the interaction of a Pd atom with a zeolite Brønsted acid site. Rice et al [8] studied the co-ordination and stability of Pd 2?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed the interactions of Pd with the extrinsic framework defects to be probed. There has been a previous study of the interaction of a palladium atom with a generic Brønsted acid site aluminosilicate cluster . However, palladium clusters are normally bound to cation-exchanged zeolites in most experimental studies and therefore this particular interaction is not considered here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%