1990
DOI: 10.1021/ja00167a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of the structural, energetic, and acid-base properties of calix[4]arenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
196
3
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
8
196
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation of these data from the value obtained by RHF/6-31G(d) (26.7 kcal/mole) is -6.2 kcal/mole, 7.2 kcal/mole, 0.2 kcal/mole, 4.9 kcal/mole, -1.3 kcal/mole, -2.3 kcal/mole, -2.0 kcal/mole, -1.4 kcal/mole, 4.1 kcal/mole, and -1.9 kcal/mole, respectively, or 23.2%, 27.0%, 0.8%, 18.4%, 4.9%, 8.6%, 7.5%, 5.2%, 15.4%, and 7.1%, respectively. One can conclude that the above-mentioned semiempirical methods (AM1 [1], PM3) and the RHF/6-31G(d)/RHF/STO-2G technique, as well as RHF/STO-2G, RHF/3-21G, and RHF/6-31G, provide information about the magnitude of changes in the H bond energy in the compounds under study, which is in reasonable agreement with the data of RHF/6-31G(d) calculations (Table 5) [1,12]. The ab initio methods of calculation, where geometry optimization is fulfilled in one approximation and the energy of a structure is calculated in another (in particular, at second order Möller Plesset level of theory), obviously slightly exaggerate the strength of H bonds in calix [4]arene; as a result, changes in H bond energy obtained by these methods approximate the value obtained by RHF/STO-2G.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The deviation of these data from the value obtained by RHF/6-31G(d) (26.7 kcal/mole) is -6.2 kcal/mole, 7.2 kcal/mole, 0.2 kcal/mole, 4.9 kcal/mole, -1.3 kcal/mole, -2.3 kcal/mole, -2.0 kcal/mole, -1.4 kcal/mole, 4.1 kcal/mole, and -1.9 kcal/mole, respectively, or 23.2%, 27.0%, 0.8%, 18.4%, 4.9%, 8.6%, 7.5%, 5.2%, 15.4%, and 7.1%, respectively. One can conclude that the above-mentioned semiempirical methods (AM1 [1], PM3) and the RHF/6-31G(d)/RHF/STO-2G technique, as well as RHF/STO-2G, RHF/3-21G, and RHF/6-31G, provide information about the magnitude of changes in the H bond energy in the compounds under study, which is in reasonable agreement with the data of RHF/6-31G(d) calculations (Table 5) [1,12]. The ab initio methods of calculation, where geometry optimization is fulfilled in one approximation and the energy of a structure is calculated in another (in particular, at second order Möller Plesset level of theory), obviously slightly exaggerate the strength of H bonds in calix [4]arene; as a result, changes in H bond energy obtained by these methods approximate the value obtained by RHF/STO-2G.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The energies of cooperative hydrogen bonds in calix [4]arene and calix [6]arene were calculated by the procedure suggested by P. Grootenhuis [1] and applied previously [12]. At first we determined the energy of the neutral compound relative to the energy of the monoanion obtained by proton elimination from the optimized neutral structure of the cone conformer of calix [4]arene or compressed cone conformer of calix [6]arene and subsequently optimized with the same level of accuracy as for the neutral conformer (Grad RMS = 10 -6 Hartree/Bohr):…”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other measurements in non aqueous solvents were carried by Shinkai and co-workers 12 for p-tert-butylcalix[n]arenes who found, for n = 4, an apparent pKa of 4.11. It seems that with the change of solvent for acetonitrile, the calixarene remains in the same range of acidity, when compared with ammonium ions, confirming a more acidic behavior of calixarenes in relation to the corresponding phenols, 13 despite the change in solvent properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%