2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of non-ideal and mildly-unstable detonation waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean curvature of the detonation front was computed from the averaged shape of the combined wave. At each time step, the position of every point constituting the leading shock was also detected by means of a pressure threshold and then averaged during the simulation by the following discrete mean procedure 53 . Consider the temporal mean ψ of a given variable ψ where T = t − t 0 is the sampling period.…”
Section: A Detonation Velocity Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean curvature of the detonation front was computed from the averaged shape of the combined wave. At each time step, the position of every point constituting the leading shock was also detected by means of a pressure threshold and then averaged during the simulation by the following discrete mean procedure 53 . Consider the temporal mean ψ of a given variable ψ where T = t − t 0 is the sampling period.…”
Section: A Detonation Velocity Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Sow, Chinnayya & Hadjadj (2014) proposed the Favre average procedure for the detonation in the non-inertial instantaneous shock frame to take into account the unsteadiness of the shock front. So far, the Favre average procedure to obtain 1-D profiles was applied to planar detonations Radulescu et al 2007;Maxwell et al 2017;Taileb et al 2018;Sow, Lau-Chapdelaine & Radulescu 2021;Taileb, Meluguizo-Gavilances & Chinnayya 2021b), in non-uniform mixtures (Mi, Timofeev & Higgins 2017a;Mi et al 2017b), in mixtures with concentration gradients (Han, Wang & Law 2019), in mixtures with fluctuations in concentrations (Zhou et al 2022), cylindrical detonation (Han et al 2017), also in non-ideal configurations such as detonations bounded by an inert layer (Reynaud, Virot & Chinnayya 2017;Reynaud et al 2020), with wall losses (Chinnayya, Hadjadj & Ngomo 2013;Sow et al 2014;Sow, Chinnayya & Hadjadj 2015, in two-phase detonations with water spray (Watanabe et al 2019(Watanabe et al , 2020(Watanabe et al , 2021 and with fuel spray (Jourdaine, Tsuboi & Hayashi 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020), with wall losses (Chinnayya, Hadjadj & Ngomo 2013; Sow et al. 2014; Sow, Chinnayya & Hadjadj 2015, 2019), in two-phase detonations with water spray (Watanabe et al. 2019, 2020, 2021) and with fuel spray (Jourdaine, Tsuboi & Hayashi 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%