2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of metallic dopant segregation and embrittlement at molybdenum grain boundaries

Abstract: Mo and its alloys have been widely used as refractory materials owing to their excellent high temperature properties, but a critical limitation is their low ductility. Doping the grain boundaries (GBs) of Mo with metals such as Zr or Al have previously been demonstrated as a promising approach to address this shortcoming, whereas other alloy elements are known to embrittle the GBs. In this work, we investigated the segregation and strengthening/embrittling effects of 29 metallic dopants at the Σ5 (310) tilt an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The near future DFT applications for investigations of material properties and for prediction of novel materials with tailored technological specifications may be foreseen, and has already started, in four basic directions (for each area we provide several references, which coin the path): 1) finite temperature effects, [37,38,125,127,129,[131][132][133][134]160] 2) extended defects (grain boundaries, stacking faults, dislocations, etc. ), [8,98,[193][194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209] 3) materials of relevance for real applications (complex compositions, realistic conditions, etc. ), [31,63,68,159,160,176,179,[210][211][212][213][214][215] and 4) high-throughput search for novel materials [13,[215]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near future DFT applications for investigations of material properties and for prediction of novel materials with tailored technological specifications may be foreseen, and has already started, in four basic directions (for each area we provide several references, which coin the path): 1) finite temperature effects, [37,38,125,127,129,[131][132][133][134]160] 2) extended defects (grain boundaries, stacking faults, dislocations, etc. ), [8,98,[193][194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209] 3) materials of relevance for real applications (complex compositions, realistic conditions, etc. ), [31,63,68,159,160,176,179,[210][211][212][213][214][215] and 4) high-throughput search for novel materials [13,[215]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface slab structures from the Crystalium database, [33,37] which contains the precomputed surface energies and Wulff shapes of most elements in the Periodic Table. For 3. GB structures from our previous study of the effect of dopants on Mo GBs [32]. Specifically, DFT data from the relaxation of the (100) Σ5 twist and (310) Σ5 tilt, and static calculations of (110) Σ3 twist, (111) Σ3 tilt and (110) Σ11 twist boundaries were included.…”
Section: A Training Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…△C and △R are the two most important factors to influence the strengthening energies. This may explain why the two-factor model is able to account for most of the variation in the strengthening energies in Mo GBs [28]. As shown in Figure 5, the features △H, △C and △R show a positive correlation with grain boundary embrittlement, while RS appears a negative correlation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Except the similar common feature of ∆C or related quantities with previous modes, the ratio of bonding energies between the solute and solvent, captured by the ratio of their surface energies (RS), was emphasized in their model [27]. Instead of the traditional one-factor bond-breaking model that relates ∆E SE with relative cohesive energy, Tran et al used a simple two-factor linear model described by the relative metallic radii and the relative difference in cohesive energy, and found it is able to account for most of the variations in the ∆E SE with a value of r 2 > 0.79 [28].The above semi-empirical models and accurate first-principles calculations significantly advance the understanding of solute-induce changes of GB cohesion undoubtedly. However, these methods are limited either in terms of their accuracy or high computational cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%