2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2006.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of AgCl and AgBr semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separately we have seen that the HF calculations significantly overestimate the bandgap, which is a general observation and its value is comparable to that reported by Apra et al [6]. The present FP-LAPW bandgap is lower than the experimental data but in reasonable agreement with the earlier FP-LAPW data [8,9]. In Table 3, we have listed the isotropic experimental Compton profiles along with the unconvoluted theoretical profiles (spherically averaged) for both semiconductors.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 41 Energy Bands And Dos Insupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Separately we have seen that the HF calculations significantly overestimate the bandgap, which is a general observation and its value is comparable to that reported by Apra et al [6]. The present FP-LAPW bandgap is lower than the experimental data but in reasonable agreement with the earlier FP-LAPW data [8,9]. In Table 3, we have listed the isotropic experimental Compton profiles along with the unconvoluted theoretical profiles (spherically averaged) for both semiconductors.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 41 Energy Bands And Dos Insupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The LCAO-based energy bands and DOS have been plotted using DL Visualize software [37]. Except for some fine structures and bandgaps, the overall Original Paper shape of our energy bands is in agreement with the reported data [7][8][9][11][12][13]. Here, we interpret the energy bands (with energy scale as E -E F ) deduced from the FP-LAPW approach in the energy range -6.0 eV to 12.0 eV as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Lcao Calculationssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is known that calculations with a GGA functional can substantially underestimate the band gaps of semiconductors but the relative values of the band gaps of different crystals as estimated with the same functional are typically comparable [16]. Furthermore, the topology of the band structures around the valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) is generally not strongly affected by the GGA approximation [17][18][19]. These observations support the use of a GGA-level functional here to investigate the effective carrier mass in La-doped NaTaO 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%