2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational study of a bluff body aerodynamics: Impact of the laminar-to-turbulent transition modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the two geometries of the closed box section tested in a wind tunnel and discussed in this paper. Table 1 summarizes the geometrical parameters illustrated in Figure 2 [3,[22][23][24][25]. Rizzo et al 2018 [7] discussed the trend of the mean pressure coefficients for all fifteen angles of attack tested in a wind tunnel [3].…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Experimental Setup: Pressure Random Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the two geometries of the closed box section tested in a wind tunnel and discussed in this paper. Table 1 summarizes the geometrical parameters illustrated in Figure 2 [3,[22][23][24][25]. Rizzo et al 2018 [7] discussed the trend of the mean pressure coefficients for all fifteen angles of attack tested in a wind tunnel [3].…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Experimental Setup: Pressure Random Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the discussion of the uncertainty [14][15][16][17][18][19] related to the non-dimensionalization of pressure coefficients [20,21], a wind tunnel experimental campaign was proposed for closed box sections of a suspended bridge [22][23][24][25] carried out with the purpose to investigate the suspended bridge instability due to the wind action [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Section 2 discusses the setup of the experimental tests and the experimental error estimated by observing the stationarity, the Gaussianity [35][36][37], the fluctuation of the mean and standard deviation of the wind tunnel velocity time histories, and the blockage effect [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were compared with the 95% level of confidence of the Davenport peak factor [18][19], for two set of data, pressure coefficients time history of hyperbolic paraboloid roofs [20] (Figs. [3][4][5] and of an example of closed box section for suspended pedestrian bridge [6,13] (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Gaussian and Non-gaussian Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind tunnel experimental campaign is largely used to estimate the wind effects on structures sensitive to the wind. Structures very sensitive to the wind action are generally large span roofs [1][2][3][4][5] as for example tensile structures for which the permanent load is smaller than the wind action, suspended bridges [6] that differently than traditional bridges made of reinforced concrete that are sensitive to the seismic action [7] or steel corrosion [8] can be affected by the flutter instability and finally, high-rise buildings [9] that are slender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue is CFD simulation. The issue is described in more detail in the work of F. Rizzo, et al (2020) [15]. The authors discussed the results of computational fluid dynamics simulations, and one of the goals of the research was to analyze the impact of modeling the laminar to turbulent transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%