2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational studies of modified [Fe3S4] clusters: Why iron is optimal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HS and LS FePPIX with the four ligations were combined with the Au(111)- and C-surface models, altogether 60 models, and the structure as optimized at the BP86/def2-SVP level including the Cosmo solvation model with static dielectric constant 80 . Vertical ionization energies and electron affinities were computed for each ground state to obtain reorganization energies (section ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HS and LS FePPIX with the four ligations were combined with the Au(111)- and C-surface models, altogether 60 models, and the structure as optimized at the BP86/def2-SVP level including the Cosmo solvation model with static dielectric constant 80 . Vertical ionization energies and electron affinities were computed for each ground state to obtain reorganization energies (section ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have similar energies with a small preference for antiferromagnetic coupling; i.e., this coupling is well-behaved and does not produce artifacts. All geometries were optimized at the BP86/def2-SVP level using the Cosmo solvation model with a static dielectric constant of 80, as condensed phase screening is known to improve the accuracy of charged metal cluster geometries . The solvent probe radii were 2.0 Å for C, 1.83 Å for N, 1.72 Å for O, 1.3 Å for H, 2.0 Å for Fe, and 2.5 Å for Au.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In semi-classical Marcus theory of electron transfer, the activation barrier for electron transfer ΔG ‡ is predicted to depend on λ and the driving force ΔG o (difference in reduction potentials) by the relationship ΔG ‡ = ( λ + ΔG o ) 2 /4 λ . 34 Our computed inner-sphere contribution to reorganization energy λ i (see ESI † discussion on reorganization energy, Table S2 † , and earlier theoretical works 19, 25, 3538 ) of the [3Fe-4S] 0/1+ redox couple is 111.3 kJ/mol, which is about 6 times higher than the 18.8 kJ/mol value 19 obtained for the [4Fe-4S] 1+/2+ variant within the same Pf Fd D14C protein framework. The significantly higher reorganization energy of [3Fe-4S] explains its less frequent occurrence in electron-transfer proteins as compared to [4Fe-4S].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…1622 Density functional theory (DFT) has a long history of successful applications to Fe-S clusters, including those to Pf Fd and [3Fe-4S]. 19, 2325 In this study, we use 57 Fe-NRVS together with DFT to probe vibrational dynamics of the [3Fe-4S] cluster in Pf Fd D14C at two oxidation levels, and compare our results to those from an earlier account on the [4Fe-4S] variant from the same protein. 19 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron(II)-iron(III) redox couple can produce fast electron transfer in both high-spin and lowspin octahedral ligand fields, as the sixth redox-active electron shuffles between low-lying t2g-orbitals that point away from the metal-ligand bonds: this minimizes the change in metal-ligand bond lengths upon electron transfer and reduces reorganization energies. This advantage of the d 5 Incidentally, this design principle also defines the Td-symmetric iron-sulfur clusters, which are high-spin and thus transfer electrons in the low-lying degenerate e level [50] [51]. These circumstances are arguably a major reason why iron(II/III) is nature's predominant redox couple.…”
Section: The Case For Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%