2009
DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2009.1001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Studies of Catalytic Particles for Carbon Nanotube Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity, we consider floating particles. The substrate−Fe nanoparticle interaction was shown to change the melting depression, , which can be parametrized in the GT equation through an effective radius. , The Fe−Fe interactions are described as a sum of a Born−Mayer-type repulsive and many-body attractive energy terms, where the coefficients are obtained by fitting the cohesive energy, lattice parameter, and elastic constant of γ-Fe . The potential landscape was shown to be adequate to reproduce CNT growth, the melting depression, and the Fe−C eutectic point .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we consider floating particles. The substrate−Fe nanoparticle interaction was shown to change the melting depression, , which can be parametrized in the GT equation through an effective radius. , The Fe−Fe interactions are described as a sum of a Born−Mayer-type repulsive and many-body attractive energy terms, where the coefficients are obtained by fitting the cohesive energy, lattice parameter, and elastic constant of γ-Fe . The potential landscape was shown to be adequate to reproduce CNT growth, the melting depression, and the Fe−C eutectic point .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, CVD experiments of SWCNT growth from small (∼0.6-2.1 nm) particles indicate that the diameter of the nanotube is similar to the diameter of the catalyst particle from which it grows. In some experiments where the growth mechanism is thought to be root-growth, the ratio of the catalyst particle diameter to SWCNT diameter is ∼1.0, whereas in experiments involving pre-made floating catalyst particles this ratio is ∼1.6 48 . Formation energies are calculated with respect to decomposition into the nearby stable elements or phases, depending the position in the ternary phase diagram as described later.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%