2020
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/g9d8u
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational social science for nonprofit studies: Developing a toolbox and knowledge base for the field

Abstract: How can computational social science (CSS) methods be applied in nonprofit and philanthropic studies? This paper summarizes and explains a range of relevant CSS methods, and highlights key applications in our field. Based on a typical design of empirical social science research, we define CSS as a set of computationally intensive empirical methods for data organization, concept representation, data analysis, and visualization. What makes the computational methods “social” is that the purpose of using these met… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bibliometric research has a well-established tradition, although bibliometric methods designed for large data sets have only recently been introduced to certain social science fields, including nonprofit studies (Ma et al, 2020;Ma & Konrath, 2018). Bibliometric analysis is diffusing across scientific domains because it can be used to help assess the state of research in a field of study or the impact of particular journals (Wan Utap et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometric research has a well-established tradition, although bibliometric methods designed for large data sets have only recently been introduced to certain social science fields, including nonprofit studies (Ma et al, 2020;Ma & Konrath, 2018). Bibliometric analysis is diffusing across scientific domains because it can be used to help assess the state of research in a field of study or the impact of particular journals (Wan Utap et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%