2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational simulation of trabecular adaptation progress in human proximal femur during growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of computer technology, the minimum element size of the model used for simulation can be as small as 50 microns. From the previous bone remodeling studies, it is shown that the complex structure of trabecular bone can be simulated [22-24]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computer technology, the minimum element size of the model used for simulation can be as small as 50 microns. From the previous bone remodeling studies, it is shown that the complex structure of trabecular bone can be simulated [22-24]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model may help us gain a better understanding of the relationships between bone morphology and the mechanical, as well as biological environments. Recently, state-of-the-art computational techniques in both hardware and software have been utilized to handle millions of finite elements in the PC base (even hundreds of millions in the supercomputer base) [21-23]. Hence, a further prospect of the bone adaptation model proposed in this paper is to perform a detailed 3 D bone-remodeling simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, increased computational resources have made it possible for large-scale bone-remodeling simulations to have an element size that is as small as about 50 με. This demonstrates that bone remodeling at the tissue level can create a highly complex and optimized trabecular structure in terms of bone density and orientation [21-23]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approximations should involve explicit functions of ρ, as opposed to the original objective function where u(ρ) is defined implicitly by solving (2). The first term of the goal function, see (12), is linearized in the, so-called, intervening variables ρ −α i , α > 0, see Christensen and Klarbring [4]. If the linearization is made at the point ρ k we obtain…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research aimed at applying topology optimization theory to bone remodeling can be found in, e.g., recent work by Jang and Kim [11,12,13], while studies with the converse aim, i.e., applying bone remodeling theories in structural and topology optimization, can be found in Penninger et al [19] and Andreaus et al [1]. The theoretical basis for this connection of theories is independently discussed in Jang et al [14] and Klarbring and Torstenfelt [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%