2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7fdvw
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational reconstruction of mental representations using human behavior

Abstract: Revealing the contents of mental representations is a longstanding goal of cognitive science. However, there is currently no general framework for providing direct access to representations of high-level visual concepts. We asked participants to indicate what they perceived in images synthesized from random visual features in a deep neural network. We then inferred a mapping between the semantic features of their responses and the visual features of the images. This allowed us to reconstruct the mental represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental representations serve as a substrate for a variety of cognitive tasks such as decision-making, communication and memory (Anderson, 1990). Understanding the structure of those representation is a core problem in cognitive science and is the subject of a large corpus of work in the psychological literature (Shepard, 1980(Shepard, , 1987Ghirlanda & Enquist, 2003;Battleday, Peterson, & Griffiths, 2020;Peterson, Abbott, & Griffiths, 2018;Jha, Peterson, & Griffiths, 2020;Caplette & Turk-Browne, 2022;Hebart, Zheng, Pereira, & Baker, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental representations serve as a substrate for a variety of cognitive tasks such as decision-making, communication and memory (Anderson, 1990). Understanding the structure of those representation is a core problem in cognitive science and is the subject of a large corpus of work in the psychological literature (Shepard, 1980(Shepard, , 1987Ghirlanda & Enquist, 2003;Battleday, Peterson, & Griffiths, 2020;Peterson, Abbott, & Griffiths, 2018;Jha, Peterson, & Griffiths, 2020;Caplette & Turk-Browne, 2022;Hebart, Zheng, Pereira, & Baker, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%